Things seem to be going well for equity. The malicious rumors that were circulating seems to have ebbed. They have declared a huge profit, and have been cleared by the parliamentary committe. Last weeks their share values returned a significant gain.
What does this show us?
The eyes of the frogs will not stop cows from drinking water.
Multinationals will stop at nothing to kill local competition
Local investment can be boosted if people just ignore the prophets of doom.
Our politicians are ******s and will mortgage our country to the devil if that will score them some political points. [Shame on Khalwale]
http://www.nationmedia.com/dailynation/nmgcontententry...._id=56&newsid=108910quote:
House almost cost Equity its customers
Story by OWINO OPONDO
Publication Date: 10/21/2007
The banking sector in Kenya has for long operated as a perfect study in oligopoly. For that, the few institutions available lived true to the historical purpose for which they were established – serving the interests of the elite.
I was once stranded in Meru town because an ATM of a big bank captured my card. My pleas to the branch boss to retrieve it for me so I could proceed with my planned official journey from Isiolo to Nairobi fell on deaf ears.
The smartly dressed manager, walking with a swagger, refused to assist, and insisted I had to report the matter to the head office in Nairobi. A friend advanced me a loan and my first purpose on arrival in Nairobi was to order my account closed. I moved on, and swore never to return to that bank.
For a long time, access to banking was the preserve of the rich. Indeed, multinational and big local banks demanded huge sums of money from potential customers to open and retain accounts. And failing to understand that most Kenyans lived in poverty, most of them closed down their branches in rural areas.
That, technically, raised banking services above the reach of low income earners who resorted to keeping their money under the pillow.
Similar discriminatory rules were applied to loan applications, and those seeking credit were required to put on the table vital documents such as title deeds as collateral. This made access to bank loans a preserve of the super rich and the propertied in society. The auctioneer’s hammer hung over the heads of defaulters.
Since it got the nod to transform itself from a micro-finance outfit to a commercial bank in 2004, Equity Bank has opened branches throughout the country, including rural areas that had been shunned by the big banks.
It has also demystified banking and reduced the cost of, and access to personal credit, to the chagrin of arrogant players in the sector.
However, Equity’s expansion earned it enemies within the banking sector, with allegations of malpractices bandied around by known and unknown sources.
In Parliament, East African Cooperation assistant minister Dr Bonny Khalwale dropped a bombshell on July 10 by tabling a letter by one S K Patel alleging serious malpractices and questionable shareholding in Equity Bank.
The move was sure to create panic within the institution and could have led to its atrophy were Kenyans not patriotic about their banking needs.
It is for this reason that I commend Parliament’s departmental committee for Finance, Planning and Trade for investigating the claims in the unsigned letter and others by some MPs.
Chaired by Bondo MP Dr Oburu Oginga, the committee gathered evidence from Equity chairman Mr Peter Munga and the institution’s chief executive Mr James Mwangi.
Others interviewed by the committee were Central Bank of Kenya governor Prof Njuguna Ndung’u and a former Equity Bank director, Ms Wanjiku Mugane.
Dr Oginga tabled his team’s report in Parliament on Wednesday in which Equity was handed a clean bill of health.
Then the tone of MPs turned patriotic on Thursday when they praised Equity for making banking services available to low-income earners who had been shunned by bigger local and multinational competitors.
In their evidence, both Mr Munga and Mr Mwangi reminded the Oburu team of the awards Equity had bagged due to its performance. And that with a market capitalisation of over Sh27 billion, Equity was the fourth biggest bank in Kenya and the eight among companies trading at the Nairobi Stock Exchange.
They informed the committee that Mr Mwangi’s shareholding of 7.3 per cent against the approved 5 per cent was known by the Capital Markets Authority (CMA) with which it had a social contract not to dispose of the shares until July 2008. Central Bank of Kenya governor, Prof Njuguna Ndung’u later confirmed to the committee the existence of the Equity-CMA agreement over Mr Mwangi’s shares.
Ms Mugane told the committee she had written a letter to the Equity board on levels of ownership by various staff members in good faith.
The committee report says Ms Mugane sold her shares in Equity before resigning as a director, and that she has since sold substantial shares of her firm, First Africa Capital, to the Standard Chartered Bank.
After clearing Equity of the allegations of malpractice, the House team gave its parting shot: “From the foregoing, the committee is persuaded that Equity Bank is a strong financial institution that has embarked on expansion targeting the lower market by offering very competitive packages. This trend should be encouraged for the good of the common Kenyan.”
There are lessons MPs should learn from the Equity matter. One, that banking is a confidence business. Indeed, the greatest asset of a bank is not the money in its vaults is public confidence.
This is quality that once lost, for wrong or right reasons, even the biggest bank will come tumbling down like a house of cards.
Of all things MPs do, let them not play politics with the banking sector because it is very sensitive to public perceptions. There are existing institutions to prefect the sector, including CBK and the CMA to which MPs should take claims of impropriety at Equity.
It is intriguing that the committee, in its report, did not suggest that action should be taken against Dr Khalwale who tabled the letter allegedly written by a faceless S K Patel whom the committee could not trace!
This is impunity at its most eloquent, and future parliaments must find ways of punishing members who make reckless claims that risk the general welfare of the public.
Emotions are the greatest enemy of rational arguments